| 1 |
Dnia 2014-06-13, o godz. 11:50:37 |
| 2 |
Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> For the case that we accept 4b "User patches" and 4a "Patch applying |
| 5 |
> function in package manager", I wonder if we shouldn't re-take the |
| 6 |
> vote on 1d "PATCHES support in default src_prepare" (which was a tie). |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> IMHO, once the PM has a patch function, leaving PATCHES out won't make |
| 9 |
> much sense. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Yes, especially if the Council decides to apply user patches by |
| 12 |
default. Then the following default would make sense: |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
src_prepare() { |
| 15 |
[[ ${PATCHES[@]} ]] && eapply "${PATCHES[@]}" |
| 16 |
eapply_user |
| 17 |
} |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Best regards, |
| 21 |
Michał Górny |
Archives