1 |
On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 10:01 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > I agree with William here. |
6 |
> > |
7 |
> > The SPI does not indemnify its associated projects or members. |
8 |
> |
9 |
> Well, on that I agree with William as well. I never claimed otherwise. |
10 |
> |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > Its not clear to me how trademark enforcement works, for example. Its |
13 |
> > something I am following up on as part of my SPI review (and FAQ) for the |
14 |
> > Gentoo Board (and its members, all the stuff will be public.) |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> |
17 |
> Are you doing an SPI review? Based on the fact that none of the |
18 |
> Trustees seemed interested in doing one I was actually going to reach |
19 |
> out to them myself, but I'd certainly prefer that it come from the |
20 |
> Trustees. |
21 |
|
22 |
|
23 |
I also wanted a unified front (a bunch of people have been talking about |
24 |
it.) I'll follow up on -nfp regarding who is doing what for SPI. |
25 |
|
26 |
-A |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
> |
30 |
> -- |
31 |
> Rich |
32 |
> |
33 |
> |