Archives
Archives
| From: | Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Formally have Council oversee the Foundation 2.0 | ||
| Date: | Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:01:35 | ||
| Message-Id: | CAGfcS_n+sKjoMEqckXv5jAv1dnwAR_KJChUoLqyQ7dsUuPCAQA@mail.gmail.com | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] Formally have Council oversee the Foundation 2.0 by Alec Warner |
||
| 1 | On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > I agree with William here. |
| 4 | > |
| 5 | > The SPI does not indemnify its associated projects or members. |
| 6 | |
| 7 | Well, on that I agree with William as well. I never claimed otherwise. |
| 8 | |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | > Its not clear to me how trademark enforcement works, for example. Its |
| 11 | > something I am following up on as part of my SPI review (and FAQ) for the |
| 12 | > Gentoo Board (and its members, all the stuff will be public.) |
| 13 | > |
| 14 | |
| 15 | Are you doing an SPI review? Based on the fact that none of the |
| 16 | Trustees seemed interested in doing one I was actually going to reach |
| 17 | out to them myself, but I'd certainly prefer that it come from the |
| 18 | Trustees. |
| 19 | |
| 20 | -- |
| 21 | Rich |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-project] Formally have Council oversee the Foundation 2.0 | Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> |
| Re: [gentoo-project] Formally have Council oversee the Foundation 2.0 | "William L. Thomson Jr." <wlt-ml@××××××.com> |
| Re: [gentoo-project] Formally have Council oversee the Foundation 2.0 | Matthew Thode <prometheanfire@g.o> |