Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Matthew Thode <prometheanfire@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Formally have Council oversee the Foundation 2.0
Date: Mon, 16 Jan 2017 18:40:49
Message-Id: 61ec354b-5dea-f61c-bcce-64be6affeca6@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Formally have Council oversee the Foundation 2.0 by Rich Freeman
1 On 01/16/2017 12:01 PM, Rich Freeman wrote:
2 > On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote:
3 >>
4 >> I agree with William here.
5 >>
6 >> The SPI does not indemnify its associated projects or members.
7 >
8 > Well, on that I agree with William as well. I never claimed otherwise.
9 >
10 >>
11 >> Its not clear to me how trademark enforcement works, for example. Its
12 >> something I am following up on as part of my SPI review (and FAQ) for the
13 >> Gentoo Board (and its members, all the stuff will be public.)
14 >>
15 >
16 > Are you doing an SPI review? Based on the fact that none of the
17 > Trustees seemed interested in doing one I was actually going to reach
18 > out to them myself, but I'd certainly prefer that it come from the
19 > Trustees.
20 >
21 I'd like one done, but I don't have the time :( Luckily Alec was
22 voluntold to do it :D
23
24 --
25 Matthew Thode (prometheanfire)

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Formally have Council oversee the Foundation 2.0 Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com>