| 1 |
Matthew Thode wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 01/16/2017 12:01 PM, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Mon, Jan 16, 2017 at 12:50 PM, Alec Warner <antarus@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> I agree with William here. |
| 5 |
>>> |
| 6 |
>>> The SPI does not indemnify its associated projects or members. |
| 7 |
>> Well, on that I agree with William as well. I never claimed otherwise. |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>>> Its not clear to me how trademark enforcement works, for example. Its |
| 10 |
>>> something I am following up on as part of my SPI review (and FAQ) for the |
| 11 |
>>> Gentoo Board (and its members, all the stuff will be public.) |
| 12 |
>>> |
| 13 |
>> Are you doing an SPI review? Based on the fact that none of the |
| 14 |
>> Trustees seemed interested in doing one I was actually going to reach |
| 15 |
>> out to them myself, but I'd certainly prefer that it come from the |
| 16 |
>> Trustees. |
| 17 |
>> |
| 18 |
> I'd like one done, but I don't have the time :( Luckily Alec was |
| 19 |
> voluntold to do it :D |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
I'm glad someone is. From what I am reading, I don't think SPI does all |
| 23 |
that some think it does. It would be best to ask first and then operate |
| 24 |
from that. I think Alec will ask some good questions and maybe even ask |
| 25 |
about some hypothetical situations. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
Dale |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
:-) :-) |
Archives