Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] GLEP 76: Copyright Policy [v4]
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2018 21:23:50
Message-Id: 1538515413.1436.7.camel@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] [RFC] GLEP 76: Copyright Policy [v4] by NP-Hardass
1 On Tue, 2018-10-02 at 16:29 -0400, NP-Hardass wrote:
2 > [Quoted from elsewhere for the sake of reducing ML spam]
3 > > "Not sure how all that is relevant for the v4 update. The real name
4 > > was already required in v3, which has been accepted by both Council
5 > > and Trustees.
6 > > v4 is merely a clarification that rules for copyright notice (where a
7 > > legal entity can be listed) and sign-off (which must be by a natural
8 > > person) are different."
9 >
10 > TBH, just because this criticism is being levied at the time of v4
11 > doesn't mean that the passing of v3 was without issue.
12
13 The issues of the original copyright policy as approved belonged
14 in the specific threads prior to its approval. If you failed to raise
15 your voice in those threads, you have only yourself to blame. If you
16 expressed it and it wasn't considered justified, then I'm sorry but
17 that's all.
18
19 This thread is merely about a specific wording change addressing
20 specific issue. If you have anything to add regarding this change or
21 the issue in question, please say it. If you don't, then please stop
22 hijacking this thread.
23
24 If you really believe the wider aspect of pseudonymous developers needs
25 being discussed again, please start a separate thread on that topic
26 and/or prepare a GLEP update for review. However, please be prepared to
27 *justify* your changes with actual arguments and explanation why you
28 need to do this rather than expecting us to justify requiring you to
29 follow the same rules as everybody else in Gentoo.
30
31 --
32 Best regards,
33 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature