Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council: Policy for Systemd units
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:30:00
Message-Id: CAG2jQ8gSWDH1PcwWsb0HTttRJXXfFsF+EV5hmH=jhxLt7DYbCQ@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Council: Policy for Systemd units by Rich Freeman
1 On 12 June 2013 12:24, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote:
3 >> What worries me is that we've reached the point where we need the
4 >> Council to define a policy for adding simple text file to packages.
5 >> If maintainers can't work things out then a policy can't fix that.
6 >
7 > I do agree that ideally this is often a personal issue. And yet, the
8 > issue still exists. If a dev wants to add a file to a package and the
9 > maintainer refuses the only way for the dev to get that file in is to
10 > just add themselves as a maintainer, add the file, and send bugmail to
11 > /dev/null other than stuff related to the one file they want to
12 > maintain. If the first maintainer walks away in a fit then the only
13 > remaining maintainer ends up leaving as well since the only reason
14 > they were there was to override the desires of the first.
15 >
16 > It doesn't help when people basically threaten to quit over systemd units.
17 >
18 > Rich
19 >
20
21 Unfortunately we can't please everyone. This is a FOSS project meaning
22 you don't get to always do what you want.
23 You have to be a team player, and you have to think of that users want
24 even though this is something that you never will
25 use yourself. I regret to say that but if people threaten to leave
26 over such minor things, they might as well quit instead of adding more
27 and more rules. Sometimes it sounds like a "blackmail" to me.
28 "Either do that or I will quit". A policy will never fix such
29 behaviors.
30
31 --
32 Regards,
33 Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer
34 http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang