1 |
On 12 June 2013 12:24, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> On Wed, Jun 12, 2013 at 7:17 AM, Markos Chandras <hwoarang@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
>> What worries me is that we've reached the point where we need the |
4 |
>> Council to define a policy for adding simple text file to packages. |
5 |
>> If maintainers can't work things out then a policy can't fix that. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I do agree that ideally this is often a personal issue. And yet, the |
8 |
> issue still exists. If a dev wants to add a file to a package and the |
9 |
> maintainer refuses the only way for the dev to get that file in is to |
10 |
> just add themselves as a maintainer, add the file, and send bugmail to |
11 |
> /dev/null other than stuff related to the one file they want to |
12 |
> maintain. If the first maintainer walks away in a fit then the only |
13 |
> remaining maintainer ends up leaving as well since the only reason |
14 |
> they were there was to override the desires of the first. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> It doesn't help when people basically threaten to quit over systemd units. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Rich |
19 |
> |
20 |
|
21 |
Unfortunately we can't please everyone. This is a FOSS project meaning |
22 |
you don't get to always do what you want. |
23 |
You have to be a team player, and you have to think of that users want |
24 |
even though this is something that you never will |
25 |
use yourself. I regret to say that but if people threaten to leave |
26 |
over such minor things, they might as well quit instead of adding more |
27 |
and more rules. Sometimes it sounds like a "blackmail" to me. |
28 |
"Either do that or I will quit". A policy will never fix such |
29 |
behaviors. |
30 |
|
31 |
-- |
32 |
Regards, |
33 |
Markos Chandras - Gentoo Linux Developer |
34 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~hwoarang |