Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Andrew Savchenko <bircoph@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Cc: trustees@g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Bad license and attribution by ChromiumOS and CoreOS
Date: Sat, 07 Mar 2015 03:55:56
Message-Id: 20150307065534.681790ffb1cd1c643ed9351b@gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-project] Bad license and attribution by ChromiumOS and CoreOS by Patrick Lauer
1 On Sat, 07 Mar 2015 10:22:00 +0800 Patrick Lauer wrote:
2 > Good $timezonegreeting,
3 >
4 > The README at both
5 >
6 > https://github.com/coreos/portage-stable
7 > and
8 > https://chromium.googlesource.com/chromiumos/overlays/portage-stable/+/master/README
9 >
10 > claims that:
11 >
12 > """
13 > Copyright (c) 2011 The Chromium OS Authors. All rights reserved.
14 > Use of this source code is governed by a BSD-style license that can be
15 > found in the LICENSE file.
16 > """
17 >
18 > Since this is a copy of Gentoo ebuilds this is demonstrably wrong, the
19 > copyrights on the files themselves are intact. Copyright is obviously
20 > Gentoo Foundation, and license is GPL-2.
21 >
22 > I have been unable to find a proper contact for both repositories, so I
23 > hope people that know who to contact are reading this.
24
25 1. Maybe a license and copyright violation claims should be filed
26 directly to github? They should contact upstream fast.
27
28 2. One may contact person responsible to that commit of invalid
29 README file:
30
31 Darin Petkov <petkov@××××××××.org>
32 https://github.com/coreos/portage-stable/commit/0465d53c7be43d55cfabb3dff56f32803719d0fe
33 https://codereview.chromium.org/6756045
34
35 > Once this is corrected I'd strongly suggest to both downstreams to poste
36 > a prominent notice to inform all downstream users of this issue to avoid
37 > accidental license violations.
38
39 Best regards,
40 Andrew Savchenko

Replies