| 1 |
>>>>> On Mon, 27 Feb 2017, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> the Gentoo council will meet again on March 12 at 19:00 utc in the |
| 4 |
> #gentoo-council channel on freenode. |
| 5 |
> Please respond to this message with any items you would like us to |
| 6 |
> add to the agenda to vote on or discuss. |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
In the 2014-10-14 meeting, there was the following decision under the |
| 9 |
"Git Migration Issues" topic: |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
Can we drop CVS headers post-migration? |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
Aye: blueness, creffett (proxy for ulm), dberkholz, dilfridge, |
| 14 |
radhermit, rich0, williamh |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
This was again briefly discussed in the 2016-04-10 meeting (following |
| 17 |
a discussion in the gentoo-dev mailing list) and in the 2016-11-13 |
| 18 |
meeting (with respect to a repoman check for the ebuild header). |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Since there appear to be doubts how to interpret above mentioned |
| 21 |
decision, I would like to ask the Council to clarify the following |
| 22 |
points: |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
a) Are $Id$ and $Header$ lines to be removed in the gentoo repository? |
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
b) Does this only apply to ebuilds and eclasses, or also to other |
| 27 |
files in the tree, e.g., metadata, profiles, and files in FILESDIR |
| 28 |
other than patches (like init scripts)? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
c) Should these lines be removed in one go, or should we enable a |
| 31 |
repoman check and have them fade out over time? |
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
d) Should git expansion of $Id$ be enabled (i.e., ident in git |
| 34 |
attributes)? |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
Ulrich |
Archives