Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: Kristian Fiskerstrand <k_f@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Require OpenPGP signatures from existing devs on new developer applications?
Date: Wed, 04 Jan 2017 20:59:19
Message-Id: c75bd2d8-55c6-c8ce-c73b-dcf4e0da8d5e@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Require OpenPGP signatures from existing devs on new developer applications? by Michael Orlitzky
1 On 01/04/2017 09:14 PM, Michael Orlitzky wrote:
2 > On 01/04/2017 02:47 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
3 >> On 01/04/2017 06:58 PM, Kristian Fiskerstrand wrote:
4 >>> With increasing focus on security in various contexts I'd like to
5 >>> propose that we start discussing catching up with other distributions
6 >>> and start requiring new developers' OpenPGP keyblocks to have at least
7 >>> two signatures from existing developers before applications can be
8 >>> made[A]. Amongst other things This helps building the Gentoo Web of Trust.
9 >>>
10 >
11 > By analogy with the CA system for websites: I don't care if the
12 > government of China thinks you're the Bank of America. All I want to
13 > know is, are you the guy that has my money?
14 >
15 > Likewise, I don't care if MichaƂ thinks you look like Kristian
16 > Fiskerstrand. All I want to know is, are you the guy that passed the
17 > quizzes and pasted his key into LDAP? You can change your name, move to
18 > another country, switch genders -- I don't care -- you'll always be
19 > 0x0B7F8B60E3EDFAE3 to me. Having others verify your name is interesting
20 > metadata, but it isn't your primary key.
21 >
22 >
23
24 Hopefully the ID would be the full fingerprint and not the keyid :) But
25 this is likely sufficient for existing developers, indeed, because trust
26 is built over time. However, when bringing in new developers that have
27 full commit access to the tree this becomes more murky. One way to
28 restrict that is of course a review system and partitioning on the areas
29 it is possible to contribute, but for the overall community building, I
30 consider having a stronger OpenPGP Web of Trust necessary, and that
31 includes entrance of new developers.
32
33 That might mean that the proposal is a two step rocket, first we need to
34 build a stronger Web of Trust amongst existing developers and get more
35 visibility in participation in local events happening around, which is
36 also constructive in terms of attracting new recruits. And once that is
37 established start enforcing more stringent rules when it comes to new
38 developer applications.
39
40 --
41 Kristian Fiskerstrand
42 OpenPGP keyblock reachable at hkp://pool.sks-keyservers.net
43 fpr:94CB AFDD 3034 5109 5618 35AA 0B7F 8B60 E3ED FAE3

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature

Replies