| 1 |
On Sun, Jul 17, 2022 at 11:27:56AM +0500, Anna wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 2022-07-16 14:56, John Helmert III wrote: |
| 3 |
> > On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 06:35:32PM -0400, Rich Freeman wrote: |
| 4 |
> > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 5:43 PM William Hubbs <williamh@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > > > |
| 6 |
> > > > On Thu, Jul 14, 2022 at 04:33:43PM -0500, William Hubbs wrote: |
| 7 |
> > > > > |
| 8 |
> > > > > I just found out while I was on vacation about Github's copilot feature. |
| 9 |
> > > > > |
| 10 |
> > > > |
| 11 |
> > > > It looks like the SFC is urging foss developers to ditch github over |
| 12 |
> > > > this. |
| 13 |
> > > > |
| 14 |
> > > |
| 15 |
> > > I get the sentiment, but I don't see what direct impact it will have. |
| 16 |
> > > If Gentoo stops using Github all our code will inevitably still be on |
| 17 |
> > > there and will still end up being used to train copilot. |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > Inevitably? If most of our activity moves somewhere else, I don't see |
| 20 |
> > why we couldn't blow away all of https://github.com/gentoo. |
| 21 |
> |
| 22 |
> Very bad idea. That would break sync mirrors for hundreds of users. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
The last time I checked, we only rely officially on *.gentoo.org (gentoo |
| 25 |
infra) per our social contract as primary infrastructure. I think we |
| 26 |
need to be sure users understand that github.com/gentoo is secondary and |
| 27 |
could go away any time. |
| 28 |
|
| 29 |
William |
Archives