Gentoo Archives: gentoo-project

From: hasufell <hasufell@g.o>
To: gentoo-project@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-project] Council: Policy for Systemd units
Date: Wed, 12 Jun 2013 11:57:12
Message-Id: 51B86211.9070509@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-project] Council: Policy for Systemd units by Sergey Popov
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On 06/12/2013 01:54 PM, Sergey Popov wrote:
5 >
6 > But you know about "Assignee" field in bugzilla, do not you?
7 > Maintainer in this terms is "Assignee", co-maintainer(s) goes in CC
8 > field.
9 >
10 > Sometimes co-maintainer and maintainers have different levels of
11 > authority
12
13 No, they don't. There might be a different level of knowledge about a
14 package and that is exactly the criteria I follow when choosing
15 assignee/CC, sometimes just by judging the ChangeLog.
16 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
17 Version: GnuPG v2.0.20 (GNU/Linux)
18 Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
19
20 iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJRuGIRAAoJEFpvPKfnPDWzgp8IAIxfO3DBkZMAY5VKCuuSRrFN
21 sWnSoVk0IW8vR71wUGNUpEnv58dgkxyYeKFbyFVMCCPY0PzeUz6m4v9zGUH9ubuT
22 pPBI4TAR621j++oaYmxBKvakP1UIIGG4HRpglwFaNtXtRNVdcO9gm2HtR/WnHfL5
23 0FmSpw0DD26KdpUEjoCZh8nTtSKIGzbPPTKTnjpF5iGePzR/FENqGXLy3FkcdyLE
24 J0hJzTTR51ba7kxgLQbt99i8nI8rtYCfLsKsXmqeZym1nUq5a1ng8wxMRsTfqxGl
25 wO0mbawgMXchnOTEMY+/n+OF2Mk3E0a2iVCr4LLxpiVHQnM6gB7yT8KqSyxk3i8=
26 =LQdP
27 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-project] Council: Policy for Systemd units Sergey Popov <pinkbyte@g.o>