1 |
On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 11:01 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> On Tue, May 16, 2017 at 10:40 AM, Dale <rdalek1967@×××××.com> wrote: |
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > Some of us long term Gentoo users care. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> If you do care, then about the worst thing you can do is make posts |
8 |
> like this on a mailing list. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Potential Gentoo contributors will read your post and decide to use |
11 |
> some other distro. Then there are fewer people making improvements to |
12 |
> Gentoo, and thus the distro becomes less useful to you. |
13 |
> |
14 |
> This is one of those situations where talking about a problem becomes |
15 |
> a problem... |
16 |
|
17 |
While I certainly understand what you're saying, I think this is a slippery |
18 |
slope - "Don't talk about our problems, people will notice, we need to |
19 |
pretend to be perfect!" leads to actual problems festering, going |
20 |
unresolved, and becoming much larger than they should be. It's also *very* |
21 |
much not in the spirit of Open Source. |
22 |
|
23 |
That being said - do you have direction on where issues like these *should* |
24 |
be discussed, if not on the ML? I'm certainly fine with a "This issue isn't |
25 |
appropriate for discussion *here*, please take it to ${SOMEWHERE}" |
26 |
statement. :) |
27 |
|
28 |
(And no, this is not a statement of opinion one way or the other on the |
29 |
original topic of this thread - that's not something I feel qualified to |
30 |
opine upon...) |
31 |
|
32 |
Thanks! |
33 |
|
34 |
-James |
35 |
|
36 |
|
37 |
> |
38 |
> |
39 |
> -- |
40 |
> Rich |
41 |
> |