1 |
On 10/13/2016 11:35 AM, Matthew Thode wrote: |
2 |
> Current bylaws state that to become a member you need to petition the |
3 |
> trustees for membership to the foundation. What verification is done by |
4 |
> trustees is up in the air. Members also seem to be members for life |
5 |
> unless they remove themselves are are removed by a vote of the trustees. |
6 |
> |
7 |
> I suggest we use and/or modify the existing staff quiz for use as a |
8 |
> guide for who to admit, as 'graded' by trustees. I also suggest that |
9 |
> some for of positive acknowledgement that they will adhere to the CoC |
10 |
> would be helpful as well. |
11 |
> |
12 |
> Now, some have floated the idea that the foundation membership is |
13 |
> somewhat defunct, and that may be the case. Personally I think it |
14 |
> should be reaffirmed each year (or some other time period that is agreed |
15 |
> upon). But to 'clean' it up I think we should ask the existing members |
16 |
> to at least agree to the CoC, and possibly also be staff. |
17 |
> |
18 |
> It's also been suggested that the foundation (active) membership is |
19 |
> waning, so once / if we decide on an update to the membership policy I |
20 |
> think we should mail the lists petitioning for memebers (-dev -project |
21 |
> and maybe some others) |
22 |
> |
23 |
> The above would be an update to the bylaws and I want feedback before I |
24 |
> propose it as an update. |
25 |
> |
26 |
|
27 |
I've opened this up for comments (and slightly updated it) because email |
28 |
is a horrible form for document editing. |
29 |
|
30 |
Also, this is _MY_ working document, if tangents come off it it in the |
31 |
comments that _I_ don't see as useful they will be removed. Don't get |
32 |
mad if I don't take your change as this is my proposal. If you disagree |
33 |
go make your own :P |
34 |
|
35 |
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1a4s20RMG9DxfMAKxS7VQb5-Dmb64IFIYBXbYtSkyiwk/edit?usp=sharing |
36 |
|
37 |
-- |
38 |
-- Matthew Thode (prometheanfire) |