1 |
Dnia 14 października 2016 06:37:07 CEST, Nick Vinson <nvinson234@×××××.com> napisał(a): |
2 |
> |
3 |
> |
4 |
>On 10/13/2016 06:06 PM, Matthew Thode wrote: |
5 |
>> Some definitions |
6 |
>> - All devs are staff |
7 |
>> - All staff are foundation members |
8 |
>> - All foundation members are staff |
9 |
>> - All foundation members are voting |
10 |
>> - You can be staff without being a dev (forum, bugs, irc) |
11 |
>> - Foundation membership is automatically revoked if you miss two |
12 |
>> Foundation elections (not sure if this needs to change) |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> Proposal |
15 |
>> - All prospective staff must apply to be Foundation members, allowing |
16 |
>> for final approval by the trustees as is the current policy. Anyone |
17 |
>not |
18 |
>> accepted will not be given staff membership. |
19 |
>> - Any Foundation membership granted as a result of a staff position |
20 |
>is |
21 |
>> lost when the position as staff is concluded. |
22 |
>> - Any staff that is kicked or leaves during a ComRel incident may |
23 |
>> appeal their incident with the appropriate body. They will either |
24 |
>> retain or lose both staff and foundation membership simultaneously. |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> Knock on effects |
27 |
>> - May need to modify staff quiz. Developers already take this so |
28 |
>will |
29 |
>> automatically satisfy this requirement. Positive CoC acknowledgement |
30 |
>> should be included in the staff quiz. |
31 |
>> - By equating staff and Foundation membership we may have to change |
32 |
>the |
33 |
>> retirement criteria for staff. |
34 |
>> - Staff will have to vote in Foundation elections. |
35 |
>> - Staffers who are not devs do not belong to a project |
36 |
>> - projects could be made |
37 |
>> |
38 |
>> Questions |
39 |
>> - Do staff get gentoo.org email addresses? |
40 |
>> - I do not think it’s necessary |
41 |
>> (limits our liability (email addresses could be considered as |
42 |
>loosing |
43 |
>> property rights as mentioned elsewhere in one of these threads...), |
44 |
>maybe) |
45 |
> |
46 |
>I don't think so (but not a lawyer). Otherwise, you wouldn't see |
47 |
>companies assigning email addresses to their employees with the company |
48 |
>domain. |
49 |
> |
50 |
>That said, it might be nice if you could use the email addresses to |
51 |
>figure out who you're talking to at first glance. Something like: |
52 |
> |
53 |
>.staff.getnoo.org -- general staff member |
54 |
>.dev.gentoo.org -- gentoo developer |
55 |
>.trustee.gentoo.org -- gentoo trustee |
56 |
>.councilor.gentoo.org -- gentoo council member |
57 |
|
58 |
And you suddenly invalidate the email on next election? |
59 |
|
60 |
> |
61 |
>etc. |
62 |
> |
63 |
>Plese note that I'm not suggesting each project get its own subdomain. |
64 |
>Just a few "key" top-level entities / groups inside Gentoo. |
65 |
>> |
66 |
|
67 |
|
68 |
-- |
69 |
Best regards, |
70 |
Michał Górny (by phone) |