Archives
Archives
| From: | hasufell <hasufell@g.o> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-project@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-11-08 | ||
| Date: | Tue, 27 Oct 2015 19:29:42 | ||
| Message-Id: | 562FD09D.80204@gentoo.org | ||
| In Reply to: | Re: [gentoo-project] Re: Call for Agenda Items -- Council Meeting 2015-11-08 by Ciaran McCreesh |
||
| 1 | On 10/27/2015 08:22 PM, Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 | > On Tue, 27 Oct 2015 20:11:37 +0100 |
| 3 | > hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 | >> It's still not clear to me how this is supposed to work at all. Are we |
| 5 | >> expected to run eautoreconf unconditionally just in case a user will |
| 6 | >> throw in a patch that alters the build system? |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | > No, you can opt to run it only if user patches were applied. |
| 9 | > |
| 10 | |
| 11 | How? |