1 |
On Tue, Oct 31, 2017 at 8:26 PM, Gregory Woodbury <redwolfe@×××××.com> |
2 |
wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> I apologize for calling the Council inbred. But it would be a sign of |
5 |
> respect and/or honor to be able to be called something like an |
6 |
> associate developer with a voting privilege (maybe) and thus be able |
7 |
> to join teams to contribute more actively. I probably would not |
8 |
> require anything more than a relay @gentoo.org address, no blogs, no |
9 |
> personal directory trees or webpages, maybe a directory space for |
10 |
> uploading large bits of code when needed. Is it worth considering? |
11 |
> |
12 |
|
13 |
It's not clear what this would get you. I don't think Gentoo developers |
14 |
only listen to people who have a @gentoo.org email address -- I would argue |
15 |
that we listen to people who bring their knowledge and their time to |
16 |
contribute. So yes, in that sense it is not so meaningful to me as a Gentoo |
17 |
developer that you contributed to the original SysV; I'm much more |
18 |
interested in your ability to contribute useful bits and pieces to |
19 |
discussions on these mailing lists (and yes -- conciseness is an important |
20 |
consideration for me personally in judging messages to the list), produce |
21 |
useful bugs and, more importantly patches. The more of those you do, the |
22 |
more of a "vote" you will be granted. |
23 |
|
24 |
I'll go on record as saying that I do agree we should do away with the |
25 |
quizzes, but that's more because I'm more interested in letting people |
26 |
learn the subset of quiz knowledge they'll need by leaning on their |
27 |
intrinsic motivation to get stuff done that benefits Gentoo, rather than |
28 |
putting up a barrier that has no intrinsic value. But still, becoming an |
29 |
official "developer" is, for me, only the last step in a longer process |
30 |
showing you have something to contribute to Gentoo. |
31 |
|
32 |
Cheers, |
33 |
|
34 |
Dirkjan |