| 1 |
On 02/01/2016 07:11 AM, Robin H. Johnson wrote: |
| 2 |
> http://goo.gl/forms/5riWkN8VMK |
| 3 |
> |
| 4 |
> I've put together a quick survey about a number of potential changes to |
| 5 |
> the rsync distribution that have been bike-shedded about in various IRC |
| 6 |
> channels and the mailing lists for some time now. |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> Questions: |
| 9 |
> (answer them on the query, input via email will not be considered or |
| 10 |
> bikeshedded). |
| 11 |
> - do you use changelogs |
| 12 |
yes |
| 13 |
> - (rsync) exclude changelogs to save local disk space |
| 14 |
no |
| 15 |
> - (rsync) order of changelog entries? |
| 16 |
the right order (reverse chronological) |
| 17 |
> - Augment/replace rsync with git repo that has thick-Manifests, changelogs, metadata |
| 18 |
No. |
| 19 |
> |
| 20 |
> |
| 21 |
> I'll report the results not sooner than 2 weeks from now, but I might |
| 22 |
> put together some intermediate results if I see anything interesting |
| 23 |
> happening. |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> P.S. For the crowd that wants to claim I'm depending on some non-open |
| 26 |
> infrastructure, I'm not going to go through all of the hoops to set up |
| 27 |
> some open source questionnaire infrastructure at this point. If don't |
| 28 |
> like that fact that I've used Google, simply don't answer the survey, |
| 29 |
> and feel free to complain about any results that I do end up collecting. |
| 30 |
> |
| 31 |
Eh, don't expect me to figure out how to operate such things :) |
Archives