1 |
On Sat, Mar 31, 2018 at 5:17 PM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
|
3 |
> |
4 |
> So, this has been debated before, so I won't elaborate on it |
5 |
> extensively, but I think it would be healthier to have these sorts of |
6 |
> users become developers and vote for both the Council and the |
7 |
> Trustees, than to have two different constituencies, because this only |
8 |
> increases the opportunity for conflict between these bodies. |
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
I disagree strongly and think this is unwise because many may contribute |
12 |
but not have time to go through the recruitment process or any interest in |
13 |
being part of the project. Also, it is critical that there is |
14 |
representation from outside of the project proper, as the Gentoo developer |
15 |
world can become (many will argue that is already has become) a kind of |
16 |
mono-culture. |
17 |
|
18 |
My proposal was very specific and accomplishes what is necessary to ensure |
19 |
user representation in decision-making and also ensures that current |
20 |
behavioral issues are addressed. |
21 |
|
22 |
-Daniel |