| 1 |
On Sat, 14 Jan 2017 20:58:04 -0800 |
| 2 |
Seemant Kulleen <seemantk@×××××.com> wrote: |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> "It must have at least one lead, and may have many leads. The leads |
| 5 |
> > are selected by the members of the project. This selection must occur |
| 6 |
> > at least once every 12 months, and may occur at any time. |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> |
| 9 |
> If a project has n members, and by vote or policy or whatever, the team may |
| 10 |
> decides |
| 11 |
> that all n members are leads. In that case, I opine that the project has |
| 12 |
> no leads. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
Exactly the point I wanted to make. If everyone can be lead, then |
| 15 |
no-load is pretty much equivalent here. |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
> > OR (if the Council wishes to allow no lead as an option) |
| 18 |
> > |
| 19 |
> > "It may have no lead, one lead, or many leads, and the leads are |
| 20 |
> > selected by the members of the project. This selection must occur at |
| 21 |
> > least once every 12 months, and may occur at any time." |
| 22 |
> > |
| 23 |
> |
| 24 |
> 6 up there, half a dozen here, and a pair of 3's already in the current |
| 25 |
> language. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Seems like a hard to avoid situation. I guess my question is: are the |
| 28 |
> lead-less teams |
| 29 |
> experiencing particular challenges? |
| 30 |
|
| 31 |
Well, the proxy-maint team has been harassed multiple times about not |
| 32 |
having a defined lead. For no specific reason, except: |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
a. some people claiming it is against GLEP 39, |
| 35 |
|
| 36 |
b. ex-lead claiming the team is not run properly without him. |
| 37 |
|
| 38 |
-- |
| 39 |
Best regards, |
| 40 |
Michał Górny |
| 41 |
<http://dev.gentoo.org/~mgorny/> |
Archives