| 1 |
Ciaran McCreesh wrote: |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
> On Mon, 19 May 2008 19:25:14 +0100 |
| 4 |
> Steve Long <slong@××××××××××××××××××.uk> wrote: |
| 5 |
>> No one here is arguing that we have a slacking Council, similar to |
| 6 |
>> the "bad old days", are they? |
| 7 |
> |
| 8 |
> A Council that conveniently fails to turn up when discussing things |
| 9 |
> that either don't interest them or that might make them look bad? A |
| 10 |
> Council holding secret meetings and conspiring with the devrel lead |
| 11 |
> behind the rest of devrel's backs? A Council that simultaneously says |
| 12 |
> "yes, we were behind musikc's actions" and "no, it was solely musikc's |
| 13 |
> decision"? That's a lot like the old days. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
Saying it's someone's call and that you support them in making that decision |
| 16 |
strikes me as the chain-of-command in operation. |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
And I note you're not saying that you think the Council have been slacking |
| 19 |
in the way you outlined in your earlier post as the motivation for this |
| 20 |
policy. |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Politicking and sniping? Just like the old days; everyone else has moved on. |
| 23 |
Why not just concentrate on your Gentoo fork[1]? Or is all this FUD just a |
| 24 |
way of slowing down the competition? Well it's been working for 2 or 3 |
| 25 |
years, I can see why you keep on with the tactic. |
| 26 |
|
| 27 |
I assume you won't be using the Gentoo tree, with its shoddy QA, for |
| 28 |
exherbo? |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
[1] http://www.exherbo.org/ |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
|
| 33 |
-- |
| 34 |
gentoo-project@l.g.o mailing list |
Archives