1 |
On Fri, Jun 13, 2014 at 5:50 AM, Ulrich Mueller <ulm@g.o> wrote: |
2 |
> |
3 |
> For the case that we accept 4b "User patches" and 4a "Patch applying |
4 |
> function in package manager", I wonder if we shouldn't re-take the |
5 |
> vote on 1d "PATCHES support in default src_prepare" (which was a tie). |
6 |
|
7 |
Makes sense. |
8 |
|
9 |
I think the real objection isn't to those particular EAPI features, |
10 |
but rather a philosophical debate over what belongs in EAPI vs what |
11 |
belongs in eclasses. I already put in my two cents on -dev on that |
12 |
one. |
13 |
|
14 |
Rich |