1 |
W dniu sob, 07.04.2018 o godzinie 16∶08 -0400, użytkownik Alec Warner |
2 |
napisał: |
3 |
> On Sat, Apr 7, 2018 at 4:04 PM, Andreas K. Huettel <dilfridge@g.o> |
4 |
> wrote: |
5 |
> |
6 |
> > Am Samstag, 7. April 2018, 22:01:26 CEST schrieb Matthew Thode: |
7 |
> > > |
8 |
> > > > However, when Daniel Robbins started playing the |
9 |
> > > > trustees against the council again, the situation deteriorated fast. |
10 |
> > > |
11 |
> > > attribution? Who said this? |
12 |
> > |
13 |
> > That is my personal interpretation of events - he became a big supporter of |
14 |
> > the trustees the moment when he realized that his efforts to become an |
15 |
> > honorary council member went nowhere... |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> |
18 |
> As a foundation member (1 person 1 vote) I don't really see drobbins making |
19 |
> much headway in this area. |
20 |
> Are you suggesting his 'trustees-based coup' is successful, or you just |
21 |
> have generic concerns about the two headed-ness of the existing system? |
22 |
> |
23 |
|
24 |
It's not like he was the first one, and I honestly doubt he's going to |
25 |
be the last one. This will keep happening as long as ComRel/Council |
26 |
(i.e. the metastructure part of Gentoo) can't rely on Trustee backing. |
27 |
|
28 |
And I'm not talking about Trustees saying they agree with the decisions |
29 |
or anything like that. All I'm asking for is solidarity. Official |
30 |
statement such as 'we will respect Council decisions on X as long |
31 |
as they are legally valid' would be enough. And cutting short all |
32 |
the suggestions to the contrary. |
33 |
|
34 |
-- |
35 |
Best regards, |
36 |
Michał Górny |