| 1 |
El jue, 25-07-2013 a las 21:16 +0200, hasufell escribió: |
| 2 |
[...] |
| 3 |
> It's mainly about consistency with our social contract and will make |
| 4 |
> people aware that gentoo by default blocks non-free software, because |
| 5 |
> every user who wants more than that, will have to edit make.conf. |
| 6 |
|
| 7 |
But do we really give the impression "Gentoo *blocks* non-free |
| 8 |
software" (that could make people not yet using Gentoo to think we are |
| 9 |
some kind of that distributions that are really blocking non-free |
| 10 |
software and, then, maybe some of them wouldn't even try it because |
| 11 |
maybe they think his nvidia card won't work ok) |
| 12 |
|
| 13 |
I would prefer to give the impression we try to use free software when |
| 14 |
possible even letting people to, for example, install other software |
| 15 |
easily without needing to use exotic third party repositories. That |
| 16 |
shows Gentoo as distribution ready for all kind of people: |
| 17 |
- People wanting to only run FREE |
| 18 |
- Others not really taking care of it. |
Archives