| 1 |
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 5:41 AM, Pacho Ramos <pacho@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> Since there is no need to stay in the herd some prefixed time, I see no |
| 3 |
> reason to allow developers to be in mail aliases without adding them to |
| 4 |
> herds.xml, and this allows others to "easily" review herds.xml looking |
| 5 |
> for empty herds. |
| 6 |
> |
| 7 |
|
| 8 |
From what you've said, the mail alias should just be ignored when |
| 9 |
reviewing herds. |
| 10 |
|
| 11 |
It is possible that the people on the alias are simply curious and |
| 12 |
have no intention of maintaining anything. I don't have a problem with |
| 13 |
that. |
Archives