| 1 |
On Monday, December 5, 2016 11:28:17 AM EST Michael Orlitzky wrote: |
| 2 |
> On 12/05/2016 11:21 AM, William L. Thomson Jr. wrote: |
| 3 |
> > I will adjust this on my end. Thanks for pointing that out :) But ASSP did |
| 4 |
> > its job, just I had my scoring to low. |
| 5 |
> |
| 6 |
> Please let me know when you think you've fixed it, so I can prove |
| 7 |
> otherwise =P |
| 8 |
|
| 9 |
Go ahead, spam me all you like. Others are welcome to the same. Its why I run |
| 10 |
ASSP for over a decade. I already lowered my scoring and showed you why it |
| 11 |
went through. You need to make sure your sending it as if you were me. I need |
| 12 |
to see the following. |
| 13 |
|
| 14 |
X-Assp-Envelope-From: wlt-ml@××××××.com |
| 15 |
X-Assp-Intended-For: wlt-ml@××××××.com |
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
However you sent it before, it was not from me as you seemed to think. You can |
| 18 |
see ASSP saw the headers, and to ASSP the from address was |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
X-Assp-Envelope-From: root@××××××××××××.com |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
You need to ensure your sending it as me to me. But even if you repeat, I |
| 23 |
lowered the threshold for scoring. It should be rejected now. |
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
-- |
| 26 |
William L. Thomson Jr. |
Archives