| 1 |
On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Rich Freeman <rich0@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Mon, Oct 3, 2016 at 2:35 PM, Raymond Jennings <shentino@×××××.com> |
| 3 |
> wrote: |
| 4 |
>> |
| 5 |
>> I would like to propose that the recruiters project open the doors |
| 6 |
>> to more |
| 7 |
>> recruiters in training. As far as I know they are severely |
| 8 |
>> overworked |
| 9 |
>> already. |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> This was the subject of a recent email to -core in Aug. I realize you |
| 12 |
> couldn't have read it (it really should have been sent out to |
| 13 |
> -dev-announce since it isn't sensitive in any way; -core is mainly for |
| 14 |
> things like trading phone numbers at conferences and such). |
| 15 |
> |
| 16 |
> Out of politeness I won't quote it, |
| 17 |
|
| 18 |
I'd have reported you for a CoC violation if your quote had any |
| 19 |
sensitive information in it ;). |
| 20 |
|
| 21 |
OTOH, if the email did NOT contain any sensitive information, perhaps |
| 22 |
you could ask the sender for consent to forward it to g-d-a? |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
> but it basically said that there |
| 25 |
> was an interest both in people interested in joining recruiters, and |
| 26 |
> in ideas to improve the process. |
| 27 |
|
| 28 |
> -- |
| 29 |
> Rich |
| 30 |
> |
Archives