Gentoo Archives: gentoo-python

From: "Michał Górny" <mgorny@g.o>
To: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-python <gentoo-python@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Binhost for pypy
Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2013 21:13:59
Message-Id: 20130218221359.5fe89468@pomiocik.lan
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-python] Binhost for pypy by Mike Gilbert
1 On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 14:51:40 -0500
2 Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote:
3
4 > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 2:44 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote:
5 > > On Mon, 18 Feb 2013 13:09:40 -0500
6 > > Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote:
7 > >
8 > >> I set up a mini-binhost in my devspace so that people can more easily
9 > >> install pypy on lower-end hardware.
10 > >>
11 > >> Add one the following to your PORTAGE_BINHOST depending on your arch.
12 > >>
13 > >> http://dev.gentoo.org/~floppym/pypy/amd64/
14 > >> http://dev.gentoo.ogr/~floppym/pypy/x86/
15 > >
16 > > Did you mean: ogre?
17 > >
18 > >> You should then be able to install pypy with emerge -g.
19 > >
20 > > Hmm, if you have both amd64 & x86, I think we should really consider
21 > > deploying pypy-bin.
22 > >
23 >
24 > Adding a separate pypy-bin package means we have to mess with the
25 > eclasses to get the deps right.
26
27 With python-r1 it should be quite simple.
28
29 Does PMS permit things like:
30
31 || ( a b || ( c d ) e )
32
33 ? AFAICS it doesn't prohibit it, saying that || () takes 'dependency
34 atoms of any type'.
35
36 > Also I have no idea how we would deal with PYTHON_REQ_USE. Maybe
37 > use.force to implement fake use flags on pypy-bin?
38
39 Yes, use.force is a good idea indeed. Or a virtual :P.
40
41 > Overall, just reusing binpkgs seems simpler.
42
43 For you, not for users :P.
44
45 --
46 Best regards,
47 Michał Górny

Attachments

File name MIME type
signature.asc application/pgp-signature