| 1 |
Dnia 2014-10-29, o godz. 16:21:20 |
| 2 |
Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 3 |
|
| 4 |
> On Wed, Oct 29, 2014 at 4:09 PM, Michał Górny <mgorny@g.o> wrote: |
| 5 |
> > Dnia 2014-10-29, o godz. 14:39:52 |
| 6 |
> > Ian Stakenvicius <axs@g.o> napisał(a): |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> >> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- |
| 9 |
> >> Hash: SHA256 |
| 10 |
> >> |
| 11 |
> >> On 29/10/14 02:31 PM, Michał Górny wrote: |
| 12 |
> >> > |
| 13 |
> >> > This is ugly. |
| 14 |
> >> > |
| 15 |
> >> > I was rather thinking of making all eclasses put +impl in IUSE when |
| 16 |
> >> > only one implementation is supported. |
| 17 |
> >> > |
| 18 |
> >> |
| 19 |
> >> ...how would that work? PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET as set in make.conf |
| 20 |
> >> overrides the +impl in IUSE. |
| 21 |
> > |
| 22 |
> > Does it? |
| 23 |
> > |
| 24 |
> |
| 25 |
> Yes, it does. |
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Personally, I would prefer to remove PYTHON_SINGLE_TARGET from |
| 28 |
> profiles and have all python-single-r1 ebuilds set a +impl in IUSE. |
| 29 |
> Just need a reasonable algorithm for determining what that impl should |
| 30 |
> be. |
| 31 |
|
| 32 |
Indeed it does. However, profiles don't seem to affect +flag for me. |
| 33 |
|
| 34 |
-- |
| 35 |
Best regards, |
| 36 |
Michał Górny |
Archives