1 |
On Thu, 22 Sep 2011 11:10:13 +0200 |
2 |
Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: |
3 |
|
4 |
> > I don't think it's reasonable to have Python 2.4-2.6 in Portage tree |
5 |
> > keyworded stable (and therefore considered to be supported) and |
6 |
> > know for sure that it's just a matter of time when somebody have to |
7 |
> > recompile it and boom! half of Python modules stop working. I |
8 |
> > daresay these cases should be handled too. |
9 |
> |
10 |
> Well, I wouldn't say half of Python modules, but I agree that we |
11 |
> should probably revbump the others, too. |
12 |
|
13 |
Don't forget to apply distutils patches for 3.* as well :P. |
14 |
|
15 |
/me hides. |
16 |
|
17 |
-- |
18 |
Best regards, |
19 |
Michał Górny |