1 |
Dnia 2014-12-31, o godz. 11:41:45 |
2 |
Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> napisał(a): |
3 |
|
4 |
> > |
5 |
> > As for the choice within the list the algo needs to stay as-is for now. |
6 |
> > However, in the future we could either: |
7 |
> > |
8 |
> > a. respect EPYTHON and fallback to the other algo, |
9 |
> > |
10 |
> > b. respect pre-defined order i.e. 3.4 > 2.7, |
11 |
> > |
12 |
> > c. respect the order in PYTHON_COMPAT -- however that could be a little |
13 |
> > surprising to devs. |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > |
16 |
> > What are your thoughts? |
17 |
> |
18 |
> Starting/ending with EPYTHON from the environment seems wrong, and |
19 |
> doesn't seem to add value anyway. |
20 |
> |
21 |
> I would prefer to stick with a predefined order unless someone can |
22 |
> present a case where the ebuild author really needs to control it. |
23 |
|
24 |
Well, it isn't really about the ebuild author but about the user. |
25 |
EPYTHON idea is pretty much a reference to the python-any-r1 behavior. |
26 |
IOW, having both eclasses use the same preference handling. |
27 |
|
28 |
-- |
29 |
Best regards, |
30 |
Michał Górny |