| 1 |
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o> wrote: |
| 2 |
> On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:17 AM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> dev-python/pathlib |
| 5 |
>>> dev-python/pyutil |
| 6 |
>>> dev-python/zbase32 |
| 7 |
>>> dev-python/zfec |
| 8 |
>> |
| 9 |
>> Should the python team take these? I'm pretty sure the answer is yes |
| 10 |
>> on the first one, not sure about context on the rest. |
| 11 |
>> |
| 12 |
> |
| 13 |
> Agreed on pathlib. |
| 14 |
> |
| 15 |
> The latter 3 ultimately seem to be reverse deps of net-fs/tahoe-lafs. |
| 16 |
> I would leave them as maintainer-needed -- nothing else in the tree |
| 17 |
> uses these. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
Actually, pathlib seems to be unused in the tree. I think we could lastrite it. |
Archives