Gentoo Archives: gentoo-python

From: Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>
To: Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o>
Cc: gentoo-python <gentoo-python@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-python] Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs
Date: Thu, 11 Dec 2014 01:46:50
Message-Id: CAJ0EP41ncrbpdng07K1Bwtu8pioRUO1W0fikWOkUXiU9NF7VQw@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: [gentoo-python] Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs by Dirkjan Ochtman
1 On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 8:17 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman <djc@g.o> wrote:
2 > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 2:17 AM, hasufell <hasufell@g.o> wrote:
3 >> dev-python/pathlib
4 >> dev-python/pyutil
5 >> dev-python/zbase32
6 >> dev-python/zfec
7 >
8 > Should the python team take these? I'm pretty sure the answer is yes
9 > on the first one, not sure about context on the rest.
10 >
11
12 Agreed on pathlib.
13
14 The latter 3 ultimately seem to be reverse deps of net-fs/tahoe-lafs.
15 I would leave them as maintainer-needed -- nothing else in the tree
16 uses these.

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-python] Re: [gentoo-dev] Packages up for grabs Mike Gilbert <floppym@g.o>