1 |
Hi, |
2 |
|
3 |
My comments about the candidate release features: |
4 |
|
5 |
|
6 |
-2.6 based system w/ udev |
7 |
|
8 |
Every ppc livecd kernel is 2.6 based. udev is untested. No time to test |
9 |
before release. |
10 |
|
11 |
-better smp kernel support |
12 |
|
13 |
The smp kernel on 2004.1/x86 is the only one that boots my virtual pc. |
14 |
No problems on PPC. Please try not to generalize problems. |
15 |
|
16 |
-boot time dmesg saving support (save it to a file, /root/dmesg |
17 |
perhaps?) |
18 |
|
19 |
You're not serious about "/root/dmesg", are you? |
20 |
|
21 |
-manpages linked from the handbook (man2html?) or man in stage1 |
22 |
|
23 |
man on livecd: yes (man in stage1: no (no ufed in stage1 either) |
24 |
|
25 |
-portage package that contains release spec files |
26 |
|
27 |
emerge catalyst? |
28 |
|
29 |
-DVD iso |
30 |
|
31 |
Every user who sends me an empty DVDR gets one by regular email. |
32 |
|
33 |
-X livecd |
34 |
|
35 |
An experimental one is scheduled for 2004.2 |
36 |
|
37 |
-portage rewrite in C |
38 |
|
39 |
This is without doubt the worlds worst candidate release feature |
40 |
request list I've seen. |
41 |
|
42 |
|
43 |
Best regards, |
44 |
|
45 |
Pieter Van den Abeele |
46 |
|
47 |
|
48 |
On 10 May 2004, at 16:53, John Davis wrote: |
49 |
|
50 |
> <2004.2_request.txt> |