| 1 |
Hi, |
| 2 |
|
| 3 |
On 21:14 Sun 26 Sep , François Bissey wrote: |
| 4 |
> > What is a proper course of action here? Should we last-rite it or at |
| 5 |
> > least package.mask it to see what upstream does about their dead lisp |
| 6 |
> > compiler ? |
| 7 |
> > |
| 8 |
> Hi Thomas, |
| 9 |
> |
| 10 |
> Have you tried to contact upstream (Tim Daly) to see if being packaged in |
| 11 |
> a distro is something they are interested in. |
| 12 |
> I personally would last rite it and possibly revisit the situation every so |
| 13 |
> often. If it doesn't even build I am not sure there is a point in keeping it |
| 14 |
> in the tree. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
I will do that, for now axiom is pmasked in the science overlay because |
| 17 |
I caused some irritation when users tried to downgrade their gmp to get |
| 18 |
axiom... :( |
| 19 |
|
| 20 |
Cheers, |
| 21 |
Thomas |
| 22 |
|
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
|
| 25 |
|
| 26 |
> |
| 27 |
> Francois |
| 28 |
> |
| 29 |
|
| 30 |
-- |
| 31 |
Thomas Kahle |
Archives