Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: "François Bissey" <f.r.bissey@×××××××××.nz>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] RFC sci-mathematics/axiom
Date: Sun, 26 Sep 2010 08:15:15
Message-Id: 201009262114.22434.f.r.bissey@massey.ac.nz
In Reply to: [gentoo-science] RFC sci-mathematics/axiom by Thomas Kahle
1 > Hi all,
2 >
3 > I consider my tries of reviving sci-mathematics/axiom as failed. The
4 > current version in the tree does not compile per
5 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=326575 . I tried to bump the
6 > package, but as we found in
7 > http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=336789 the internal copy of gnu
8 > common lisp that axiom tries to build (gcl is dead-upstream hard masked
9 > in the tree) requires <dev-libs/gmp-5, otherwise it will try to build an
10 > internal copy of gmp-4 which will fail, and is unacceptable. I don't
11 > know if it is worth the effort to try to beat it to work with the
12 > system's gmp. This would probably end up in reviving gcl ourselves.
13 >
14 > What is a proper course of action here? Should we last-rite it or at
15 > least package.mask it to see what upstream does about their dead lisp
16 > compiler ?
17 >
18 Hi Thomas,
19
20 Have you tried to contact upstream (Tim Daly) to see if being packaged in
21 a distro is something they are interested in.
22 I personally would last rite it and possibly revisit the situation every so
23 often. If it doesn't even build I am not sure there is a point in keeping it
24 in the tree.
25
26 Francois

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] RFC sci-mathematics/axiom Thomas Kahle <tom111@×××.de>
Re: [gentoo-science] RFC sci-mathematics/axiom Thomas Kahle <tom111@×××.de>