1 |
My fault, |
2 |
|
3 |
I bet it were in science. |
4 |
|
5 |
Your git suggestion led me to |
6 |
|
7 |
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo.git/commit/?id=1e2193bbca8eaaab8cca1b4e61294b59f6a62714 |
8 |
"sci-geosciences/grass: Remove last-rited pkg" |
9 |
|
10 |
I'll ask if it is a version bumb strategy or Grass Gis (grass.osgeo.org) |
11 |
is going to be out of tree. |
12 |
|
13 |
Thank you, |
14 |
|
15 |
Fosco |
16 |
|
17 |
On 04/10/20 02:34, Aisha Tammy wrote: |
18 |
> On 10/3/20 5:31 PM, Fosco wrote: |
19 |
>> I found the homonym package, but they relate to different areas (genetic |
20 |
>> and geography). |
21 |
>> |
22 |
>> sci-geosciences/grass had an update at least few months ago (my last |
23 |
>> check is "late spring"). I remember the ebuild was a couple of minor |
24 |
>> version behind the master release. |
25 |
>> |
26 |
>> My believe is that there were no scheduled removal for that package. |
27 |
>> |
28 |
>> |
29 |
> I found a log from 2010 |
30 |
> |
31 |
> commit be508b7888b1d5e4bed1ec07efd9a544a8142b9d |
32 |
> Author: Christian Schmitt <chris@××××××××××.de> |
33 |
> Date: Mon Jun 14 13:45:37 2010 +0200 |
34 |
> |
35 |
> [sci-geosciences/grass] remove the grass version. better one available in portage now |
36 |
> |
37 |
> So it seems like it has not been in science for a *really* long time. |
38 |
> |
39 |
> Aisha |
40 |
> |
41 |
> |
42 |
>> Possible tree corruption? |
43 |
>> |
44 |
>> Fosco |
45 |
>> |
46 |
>> On 03/10/20 21:17, Aisha Tammy wrote: |
47 |
>>> On 10/3/20 2:58 PM, Aisha Tammy wrote: |
48 |
>>>> On 10/3/20 2:50 PM, Fosco wrote: |
49 |
>>>>> Hi all. |
50 |
>>>>> |
51 |
>>>>> I recently synced and found that sci-geosciences/grass has no available |
52 |
>>>>> ebuilds. |
53 |
>>>>> |
54 |
>>>>> I checked on https://packages.gentoo.org/packages/sci-geosciences/grass |
55 |
>>>>> and the server returns 404. |
56 |
>>>>> |
57 |
>>>>> I checked with no luck for a move on https://gpo.zugaina.org/ . |
58 |
>>>>> |
59 |
>>>>> I didn't notice a "under removal" flag on Grass Gis recently. |
60 |
>>>>> |
61 |
>>>>> Am I missing something? |
62 |
>>>>> |
63 |
>>>>> Thank you |
64 |
>>> My apologies, seems I misremembered grass as pydap (which I removed) |
65 |
>>> |
66 |
>>> We still have a package sci-biology/grass present in the tree. |
67 |
>>> Perhaps this is the one that you meant? |
68 |
>>> |
69 |
>>> Aisha |
70 |
>>> |
71 |
>>>> Yes, grass was removed as it had not been updated in over 3 years. |
72 |
>>>> We are currently short of personnel to keep sci clean and update, so |
73 |
>>>> we removed the package. |
74 |
>>>> |
75 |
>>>> If you are interested in having grass present, we would love to get |
76 |
>>>> it back with a maintainer, even better if it has been updated upstream. |
77 |
>>>> |
78 |
>>>> Best, |
79 |
>>>> Aisha |
80 |
>>>> |
81 |
> |