1 |
Are you sure? They are all valid (though equery resolves the links): |
2 |
|
3 |
~» equery b /usr/lib/{libcblas.so,libf77blas.so,libatlas.so} |
4 |
* Searching for |
5 |
/usr/lib/libcblas.so,/usr/lib/libf77blas.so,/usr/lib/libatlas.so ... |
6 |
sci-libs/atlas-3.10.1-r1 (/usr/lib64/libatlas.so.3) |
7 |
sci-libs/atlas-3.10.1-r1 (/usr/lib64/libf77blas.so.3) |
8 |
sci-libs/gsl-1.14 (/usr/lib64/libgslcblas.so.0.0.0) |
9 |
|
10 |
|
11 |
|
12 |
On Fri, Aug 23, 2013 at 5:17 AM, François Bissey <fbissey@××××××××××××.nz>wrote: |
13 |
|
14 |
> On 2013-08-23 03:36, Sébastien Fabbro wrote: |
15 |
> |
16 |
>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 1:11 AM, P Purkayastha <ppurka@×××××.com> wrote: |
17 |
>> |
18 |
>> Actually I do have those libraries. Only missing one is liblapack.*. It |
19 |
>>> is |
20 |
>>> probably one of the similarly named libraries, except I don't know |
21 |
>>> which. I |
22 |
>>> don't want to find out by hit and trial given how finicky atlas is. |
23 |
>>> |
24 |
>>> |
25 |
>> If you installed atlas with gentoo, you can see which library is |
26 |
>> lapack with the atlas-lapack and atlas-lapack-threads pkg-config |
27 |
>> files. |
28 |
>> To avoid collision with lapack and cblas, the libcblas and liblapack |
29 |
>> were renamed to libatlcblas and libatllapack. All the other libraries |
30 |
>> kept their original names. |
31 |
>> |
32 |
>> The existence of the links he mentioned makes me think he has left over |
33 |
> from the old virtual from the main tree. |
34 |
> |
35 |
> Francois |
36 |
> |
37 |
> |