1 |
Quoting Johan Hattne <jhattne@×××.gov>: |
2 |
|
3 |
> On 30 Aug 2011, at 12:49, fbissey@××××××××××××.nz wrote: |
4 |
> |
5 |
>> Hi all, |
6 |
>> |
7 |
>> So I was looking at the science overlay from my prefix on OS X. |
8 |
>> And portage wanted me to upgrade my blas/cblas/lapack stack to the |
9 |
>> new structure. I know they are marked ~x86 and ~amd64 but it doesn't |
10 |
>> look good considering that I had a working stack in my prefix before. |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> So I may make things a little more prefix friendly (OS X in particular) |
13 |
>> in the coming days. I am also thinking of adding an ebuild to use the |
14 |
>> native vectorize framework on OS X, unless someone strongly objects to it. |
15 |
> |
16 |
> Hi Francois; |
17 |
> |
18 |
> With the CBLAS reference implementations, you may run into a problem |
19 |
> with the test suite on Darwin. I tried to sort this out earlier this |
20 |
> year (see |
21 |
> http://icl.cs.utk.edu/lapack-forum/archives/lapack/msg00997.html), |
22 |
> but I'm not even sure upstream recognises the problem. Please let me |
23 |
> know if at least you can reproduce the issue, and then maybe we can |
24 |
> try again to get it fixed. |
25 |
> |
26 |
Looking at that thread they don't seem to see a problem. I haven't tackled |
27 |
cblas-reference yet but I have made an ebuild to use the vectorize framework |
28 |
from apple on OS X (I'll put it in the overlay soonish) and the test suite for |
29 |
lapack-reference totaly failed when built with either blas-reference or |
30 |
vectorize. I am guessing that it must be similar to what you got with |
31 |
cblas-reference. |
32 |
|
33 |
Francois |