1 |
On 12:06 Fri 02 Nov 2012, fbissey@××××××××××××.nz wrote: |
2 |
> Quoting Thomas Kahle <tomka@g.o>: |
3 |
> |
4 |
> > On 09:42 Thu 01 Nov 2012, fbissey@××××××××××××.nz wrote: |
5 |
> >> Quoting Thomas Kahle <tomka@g.o>: |
6 |
> >> |
7 |
> >> > One more thing, This is fixed in 1.6 tree of numpy, where the |
8 |
> >> > call to gfortran uses what is in the site config. |
9 |
> >> > Will sage move to a higher version of numpy at some point? |
10 |
> >> > |
11 |
> >> > |
12 |
> >> Yes! The problem that prevent us to upgrade numpy is fixed in numpy-1.7. The |
13 |
> >> release cannot come quickly enough for us. |
14 |
> > |
15 |
> > OK. Any idea when this will happen? |
16 |
> > |
17 |
> >> For numpy 1.5 would by any chance gfortran be called with -fexternal-blas at |
18 |
> >> some point? |
19 |
> > |
20 |
> > Can't find '-fexternal' in build.log. |
21 |
> > |
22 |
> >> On my system with python 3.2 lapack was not properly detected, |
23 |
> >> that's why dotblas hasn't been built. Numpy 1.5.1 with python 3.2 used an |
24 |
> >> internal implementation of the lapack functions it uses. |
25 |
> >> |
26 |
> >> This probably explains why scipy doesn't compile with numpy 1.5 and |
27 |
> >> python 3.2. |
28 |
> > |
29 |
> > And this where all this started for me ... |
30 |
> > |
31 |
> > Anyway, the solution of my broken numpy,scipy is to wait for 1.7 or |
32 |
> > rollback to a reference-lapack that installs itself as liblapack? |
33 |
> > |
34 |
> |
35 |
> If you don't use numpy with python 3.x you could simply create a file |
36 |
> /etc/portage/env/dev-python/numpy with USE_PYTHON="2.7" in it. |
37 |
> That would skip the offending problem quite nicely without locking you |
38 |
> in a particular blas implementation. |
39 |
|
40 |
Do you have a reference for your method? It does not work for me. |
41 |
Instead in /etc/portage/env/ I have a file nopy3k.conf which contains |
42 |
just USE_PYTHON="2.7". Then in /etc/portage/package.env I configure |
43 |
|
44 |
dev-python/numpy nopy3k.conf |
45 |
|
46 |
Cheers, |
47 |
Thomas |
48 |
|
49 |
|
50 |
-- |
51 |
Thomas Kahle |
52 |
http://dev.gentoo.org/~tomka/ |