Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: Donnie Berkholz <spyderous@g.o>
To: "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@×××××××.net>
Cc: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] lapack transition
Date: Sun, 21 Aug 2005 20:30:13
Message-Id: 4308E417.3070102@gentoo.org
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] lapack transition by "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

M. Edward (Ed) Borasky wrote:
| I just returned to this list -- what is the "new infrastructure" we are
| "preparing for"?
|
| BTW, I am also on the Atlas mailing list. There was quite a bit of
| activity over the weekend regarding GCC 4. It seems the default Fortran
| in GCC 4 is Fortran 95, which has instilled great trepidation in some of
| the "old-timers" on the Atlas list. In any event, should I wish to
| experiment with GCC 4, how do I go about doing so without creaming my
| system? Do I need a whole new machine/partition?

I thought f95 was not only the default, but the only choice, and f77 was
entirely gone.

gcc is slotted so you can have many versions installed at the same time
and switch with gcc-config. Just try unmasking in package.unmask and go.

Thanks,
Donnie
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDCOQXXVaO67S1rtsRApNTAJ4qXjkRX39R0w2yki/7vvQ1vUPxTACferj/
XYnAgYAAy6IPYG3HsoijofE=
=KgvT
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
-- 
gentoo-science@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] lapack transition "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@×××××××.net>