1 |
Donnie Berkholz schrieb: |
2 |
> On 09:23 Wed 19 Dec , Justin wrote: |
3 |
> |
4 |
>> Donnie Berkholz schrieb: |
5 |
>> |
6 |
>>> On 19:18 Mon 17 Dec , Justin wrote: |
7 |
>>> |
8 |
>>> Since that bug shows that a header wasn't found at |
9 |
>>> /usr/include/gtkgl/gtkglarea.h, it might be worth checking whether that |
10 |
>>> file exists. |
11 |
>>> |
12 |
>>> |
13 |
>> This file belongs to x11-libs/gtkglarea-1.2.3-r1. So this package must |
14 |
>> be emerged for coot. |
15 |
>> |
16 |
> |
17 |
> That's not quite what I was asking. Does the file physically exist on |
18 |
> the filesystem? |
19 |
> |
20 |
> |
21 |
It exists and is provided by x11-libs/gtkglarea-1.2.3-r1. |
22 |
>>> I've got some newer ebuilds around for 0.4 prereleases that I could add |
23 |
>>> to the tree masked, if that would help. |
24 |
>>> |
25 |
> |
26 |
> I just added 0.4_pre2-r549. Unfortunately I couldn't find a better way |
27 |
> to deal with the upstream revision number than using ours for it. |
28 |
> |
29 |
> |
30 |
>> I thought for myself writing an ebuild for that, but I didn't found |
31 |
>> the sources. But I will be a happy tester if you need. The same, if |
32 |
>> you need help maintaining packages, i offer my help. The science thing |
33 |
>> should enlarge in gentoo. I wrote a couple of ebuild for my |
34 |
>> private-overlay, which work fine for me. Perhaps there is some need |
35 |
>> for that. Some packages are Arpwarp, xds, cara, and i'm working on |
36 |
>> phaser or rewriting the ccp4 ebuild so that it could emerge phaser as |
37 |
>> a dep. The only thing which im not sure about is the legal thing with |
38 |
>> those ebuilds. So if you could teach me which license the writing of |
39 |
>> ebuild alows and which, I publish them. |
40 |
>> |
41 |
> |
42 |
> I'd love to see those ebuilds. Could you get access to the science |
43 |
> overlay so you could commit them? |
44 |
How can I do this? |
45 |
> Regarding Phaser, my basic plan was to |
46 |
> get a separate cctbx ebuild, then separate ebuilds for Phaser, Chooch, |
47 |
> etc., rather than make the ccp4 ebuild any more disgusting than it |
48 |
> already is. |
49 |
> |
50 |
> The ebuilds themselves are perfectly legal since they're just recipes. |
51 |
> If the source-code license is restrictive, we can add various types of |
52 |
> RESTRICT settings to the ebuilds to prevent redistribution on Gentoo |
53 |
> mirrors (RESTRICT=mirror) or to force people to manually download it |
54 |
> (RESTRICT=fetch and pkg_nofetch() function). |
55 |
> |
56 |
> Thanks, |
57 |
> Donnie |
58 |
> |
59 |
-- |
60 |
gentoo-science@g.o mailing list |