Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: Christoph Junghans <ottxor@g.o>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] moving the science overlay to github?
Date: Wed, 08 Feb 2012 17:02:41
Message-Id: CANgp9kwhD9jFKA=fsx1KX62Mhkz36mmqA4CUQ1tVOz6nQKmLBw@mail.gmail.com
1 2012/2/8 Jan Marten Simons <marten@××××××××××××××××.de>:
2 > Thomas Kahle:
3 >> > Actualy you can send pull request even now =) Its git. See for example
4 >> > linux kernel related work
5 >>
6 >> Sure, the New Yorker publishes short stories.  In my experience this is
7 >> a huge barrier for first time contributors.  I'm seeing this with the
8 >> offlineimap project which enforces the git-format-patch and mailing list
9 >> pull-requests/review.  There are people who just want to fix three lines
10 >> in the doc but don't want to get black belts in git-fu.  Then sometimes
11 >> the maintainers won't implement the 3 line change to the doc themselves
12 >> because they want proper credit for the original contributor, so after
13 >> ~10 e-mails the original contributor tries git-email and fails to meet
14 >> the standards.  Another couple of e-mails are required do explain
15 >> sign-off, reply-to headers, ...  I'll stop here you get the point.
16 >>
17 >> IMHO using github or a self-hosted equivalent will make contributing
18 >> easier.  Clone, commit, and to some web-thingie for the pull-request.
19 >
20 > +1
21 >
22 After reading all this, +1 for github.
23
24 Maybe that would be a good point to switch to thin manifests.
25
26 Christoph
27
28 --
29 Dr. Christoph Junghans
30 http://dev.gentoo.org/~ottxor/
31
32 > With regards,
33 >
34 >  Dipl. Phys.
35 >  Jan M. Simons
36 >
37 > Institute of Crystallography
38 > RWTH Aachen University
39 >

Replies