| 1 |
03.09.14 09:53, Honza Macháček написав(ла): |
| 2 |
> On 09/03/2014 02:10 AM, François Bissey wrote: |
| 3 |
>> On Tue, 02 Sep 2014 18:42:19 Jauhien Piatlicki wrote: |
| 4 |
>>> ...(e.g. I tried to do |
| 5 |
>>> version bump for sci-physics/bigdft, but I failed as new version does |
| 6 |
>>> not compile and error is in fortran code, that I do not understand). |
| 7 |
>> |
| 8 |
>> I guess if someone is using it they will complain. Then it can be their |
| 9 |
>> job to fix it :) |
| 10 |
> |
| 11 |
> Fixing sci-physics/bigdft should be my job. I'm only rather slow with that. Send |
| 12 |
> any complaints, info or advice to me; I may not respond, and even no |
| 13 |
> improvements to the ebuild may come up for quite a long time afterwards, but I |
| 14 |
> will be working on it. |
| 15 |
|
| 16 |
|
| 17 |
sci-physics/bigdft is not the worst case. ) It only needs only version bump and little ebuild clean up. After of it you'll need to fix compilation failure because compiler complains about using f_malloc and f_free from flib with one of variables. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
-- |
| 20 |
Jauhien |
Archives