1 |
The output of |
2 |
|
3 |
nm -D /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sage/symbolic/pynac.so | grep |
4 |
ZTVN5GiNaC9containerISt6vectorEE |
5 |
|
6 |
is: |
7 |
|
8 |
U _ZTVN5GiNaC9containerISt6vectorEE (with the ZTVN part showing up in red) |
9 |
|
10 |
The output of |
11 |
|
12 |
nm -D /usr/lib64/libpynac.so.1.1.0 | grep ZTVN5GiNaC9containerISt6vectorEE |
13 |
|
14 |
is: |
15 |
|
16 |
(nothing it appears to be missing) |
17 |
|
18 |
Output of the third command is attached. The -ffat-lto-objects flag should |
19 |
be in there. I added after the first couple of packages (like pciutils, |
20 |
elfutils, openssh, etc.) wouldn't build to see if it would help so I didn't |
21 |
have to use the "no-lto" environment setting from that graphite and lto |
22 |
instruction page I referenced earlier. It didn't see to work as I now have |
23 |
a package.env file full of no-lto entries. Neither sage nor pynac are |
24 |
no-lto entries right now as it appeared to me that they merged. |
25 |
|
26 |
Jeramia |
27 |
|
28 |
|
29 |
|
30 |
On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:43 AM, François Bissey <frp.bissey@×××××.com> |
31 |
wrote: |
32 |
|
33 |
> I think I have all the logs I can use at the moment. I want the output of |
34 |
> the |
35 |
> following two commands: |
36 |
> nm -D /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sage/symbolic/pynac.so | grep |
37 |
> ZTVN5GiNaC9containerISt6vectorEE |
38 |
> |
39 |
> nm -D /usr/lib64/libpynac.so.1.1.0 | grep ZTVN5GiNaC9containerISt6vectorEE |
40 |
> |
41 |
> Actually make that 3 commands with the output of |
42 |
> readelf -d /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sage/symbolic/pynac.so |
43 |
> |
44 |
> Also to cross check that I am not missing anything fro your info output, |
45 |
> I cannot see "-ffat-lto-objects" anywhere in your compilation flags. |
46 |
> Is this correct? |
47 |
> |
48 |
> Francois |
49 |
> |
50 |
> On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:05:42 François Bissey wrote: |
51 |
> > Hum I am starting to wonder if there are things going on between lot and |
52 |
> C++ |
53 |
> > templates. More professional code may do ok but a lot of the stuff we |
54 |
> have |
55 |
> > in sage may be a bit dubious. Can you send me the penal build log please |
56 |
> > and for good measure the one for sage. You can do it privately if you |
57 |
> don’t |
58 |
> > want to post big file on the list. |
59 |
> > |
60 |
> > I have been free of grading for almost 4 years. My wife is very happy |
61 |
> about |
62 |
> > that. |
63 |
> > |
64 |
> > François |
65 |
> > |
66 |
> > > On 24/11/2014, at 17:12, Jeramia Poland <jeramia.poland@×××××.com> |
67 |
> wrote: |
68 |
> > > |
69 |
> > > Sorry for the delayed reply, I had a bunch of papers to grade. Yes, it |
70 |
> is |
71 |
> > > installed. Attached are the lld results. Jeramia |
72 |
> > > |
73 |
> > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 1:20 AM, François Bissey <frp.bissey@×××××.com |
74 |
> > |
75 |
> > > wrote: I hate automated spellchecking, I meant pynac not “penal” I |
76 |
> > > remember turning it off on an iPad after a ludicrous suggestion for |
77 |
> > > lapack. |
78 |
> > > |
79 |
> > > François |
80 |
> > > |
81 |
> > > > On 22/11/2014, at 15:33, François Bissey <frp.bissey@×××××.com> |
82 |
> wrote: |
83 |
> > > > I assume penal is installed otherwise |
84 |
> > > |
85 |
> > > <lib_link_1.txt><lib_link_2.txt> |
86 |
> |
87 |
> |
88 |
> |