Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: Jeramia Poland <jeramia.poland@×××××.com>
To: gentoo-science <gentoo-science@l.g.o>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] Emerge Sage-doc-6.3 fails 3.16.5-sources gcc-4.8.3 with lto and graphite
Date: Wed, 26 Nov 2014 05:58:19
Message-Id: CAGNNSABg5A2Dkr-KP+HFXwJJu4mps-ajdPL50oYZF16PGMsOuA@mail.gmail.com
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] Emerge Sage-doc-6.3 fails 3.16.5-sources gcc-4.8.3 with lto and graphite by "François Bissey"
1 The output of
2
3 nm -D /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sage/symbolic/pynac.so | grep
4 ZTVN5GiNaC9containerISt6vectorEE
5
6 is:
7
8 U _ZTVN5GiNaC9containerISt6vectorEE (with the ZTVN part showing up in red)
9
10 The output of
11
12 nm -D /usr/lib64/libpynac.so.1.1.0 | grep ZTVN5GiNaC9containerISt6vectorEE
13
14 is:
15
16 (nothing it appears to be missing)
17
18 Output of the third command is attached. The -ffat-lto-objects flag should
19 be in there. I added after the first couple of packages (like pciutils,
20 elfutils, openssh, etc.) wouldn't build to see if it would help so I didn't
21 have to use the "no-lto" environment setting from that graphite and lto
22 instruction page I referenced earlier. It didn't see to work as I now have
23 a package.env file full of no-lto entries. Neither sage nor pynac are
24 no-lto entries right now as it appeared to me that they merged.
25
26 Jeramia
27
28
29
30 On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 2:43 AM, François Bissey <frp.bissey@×××××.com>
31 wrote:
32
33 > I think I have all the logs I can use at the moment. I want the output of
34 > the
35 > following two commands:
36 > nm -D /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sage/symbolic/pynac.so | grep
37 > ZTVN5GiNaC9containerISt6vectorEE
38 >
39 > nm -D /usr/lib64/libpynac.so.1.1.0 | grep ZTVN5GiNaC9containerISt6vectorEE
40 >
41 > Actually make that 3 commands with the output of
42 > readelf -d /usr/lib64/python2.7/site-packages/sage/symbolic/pynac.so
43 >
44 > Also to cross check that I am not missing anything fro your info output,
45 > I cannot see "-ffat-lto-objects" anywhere in your compilation flags.
46 > Is this correct?
47 >
48 > Francois
49 >
50 > On Mon, 24 Nov 2014 19:05:42 François Bissey wrote:
51 > > Hum I am starting to wonder if there are things going on between lot and
52 > C++
53 > > templates. More professional code may do ok but a lot of the stuff we
54 > have
55 > > in sage may be a bit dubious. Can you send me the penal build log please
56 > > and for good measure the one for sage. You can do it privately if you
57 > don’t
58 > > want to post big file on the list.
59 > >
60 > > I have been free of grading for almost 4 years. My wife is very happy
61 > about
62 > > that.
63 > >
64 > > François
65 > >
66 > > > On 24/11/2014, at 17:12, Jeramia Poland <jeramia.poland@×××××.com>
67 > wrote:
68 > > >
69 > > > Sorry for the delayed reply, I had a bunch of papers to grade. Yes, it
70 > is
71 > > > installed. Attached are the lld results. Jeramia
72 > > >
73 > > > On Sun, Nov 23, 2014 at 1:20 AM, François Bissey <frp.bissey@×××××.com
74 > >
75 > > > wrote: I hate automated spellchecking, I meant pynac not “penal” I
76 > > > remember turning it off on an iPad after a ludicrous suggestion for
77 > > > lapack.
78 > > >
79 > > > François
80 > > >
81 > > > > On 22/11/2014, at 15:33, François Bissey <frp.bissey@×××××.com>
82 > wrote:
83 > > > > I assume penal is installed otherwise
84 > > >
85 > > > <lib_link_1.txt><lib_link_2.txt>
86 >
87 >
88 >

Attachments

File name MIME type
readelf.txt text/plain

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] Emerge Sage-doc-6.3 fails 3.16.5-sources gcc-4.8.3 with lto and graphite "François Bissey" <frp.bissey@×××××.com>