1 |
On 09/10/2010 05:47:10 AM, François Bissey wrote: |
2 |
>> On 09/09/2010 03:47:27 AM, François Bissey wrote: |
3 |
>> > Hi Steve, |
4 |
>> > |
5 |
>> > just to be clear, when you enter the data of the test manually in sage |
6 |
>> > there is no problems? |
7 |
>> > We already have one test like that, and there are a few reports of |
8 |
>> > phantom failing tests on sage-devel so it is possible. |
9 |
>> > |
10 |
>> > Francois |
11 |
>> |
12 |
>> François , |
13 |
>> |
14 |
>> When the following |
15 |
>> |
16 |
>> sage: x = polygen(GF(121, 'a')) |
17 |
>> sage: C = HyperellipticCurve(x^5 + x - 1, x^2 + 2) |
18 |
>> sage: len(C.points()) |
19 |
>> 122 |
20 |
>> |
21 |
>> is entered manually I get the expected result. The last line of the sage |
22 |
>> input is where |
23 |
>> |
24 |
>> sage -t -force_lib |
25 |
>> "devel/sage/sage/schemes/hyperelliptic_curves/hyperelliptic_finite_field.py |
26 |
>> " |
27 |
>> |
28 |
>> fails. I downgraded to |
29 |
>> |
30 |
>> sage-doc-4.5.2-r1 |
31 |
>> numpy-1.3.0-r2 |
32 |
>> scipy-0.7.2-r1 |
33 |
>> sage-4.5.2-r1 |
34 |
>> |
35 |
>> and the test passed. I then upgraded to the latest sage-doc, numpy, scipy |
36 |
>> and sage and the test passed, but only the first time. On subsequent tries |
37 |
>> the test has failed. |
38 |
>> |
39 |
> The important bit, I think, is that when you enter the data manually you get |
40 |
> the expected results. There is quite possibly something wrong with the |
41 |
> doctests framework. Some of it may come from the port to Gentoo, but |
42 |
> as I said there are other people in the sage community that wonder about |
43 |
> the same thing. |
44 |
> |
45 |
> We probably should enter that as a recorded issue on github, other people |
46 |
> may get it from time to time. |
47 |
> |
48 |
> Francois |
49 |
> |
50 |
Just an update. The subject test of this thread no longer fails here with |
51 |
sage-4.5.3? |
52 |
|
53 |
Steve |