Archives
Archives
| From: | "François Bissey" <f.r.bissey@×××××××××.nz> | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| To: | gentoo-science@l.g.o | ||
| Subject: | Re: [gentoo-science] sage -> numpy -> lapack | ||
| Date: | Wed, 30 Jun 2010 08:51:13 | ||
| Message-Id: | 201006302051.03863.f.r.bissey@massey.ac.nz | ||
| In Reply to: | [gentoo-science] sage -> numpy -> lapack by Thomas Kahle |
||
| 1 | > Hi, |
| 2 | > |
| 3 | > The way that sage depends on lapack and numpy is broken at the moment. |
| 4 | > Can somebody look at bug 320669 ? |
| 5 | > At least here on x86 it is not possible to get a working sage at the |
| 6 | > moment. Let me know if there is anything I can test or do. |
| 7 | > |
| 8 | this is a bit more subtle than that Thomas. I have 2 x86 machines, |
| 9 | one with problems and one without. Christopher doesn't have problems |
| 10 | on his x86 machine either. |
| 11 | Why is this bug not affecting amd64? |
| 12 | |
| 13 | Francois |
| Subject | Author |
|---|---|
| Re: [gentoo-science] sage -> numpy -> lapack | Thomas Kahle <tom111@×××.de> |