Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: Steven Trogdon <strogdon@×××××.edu>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] [sage-on-gentoo] numpy-1.4.1/scipy-0.8.0
Date: Thu, 09 Sep 2010 14:24:37
Message-Id: 1284042156.17649.0@pavilion64
In Reply to: Re: [gentoo-science] [sage-on-gentoo] numpy-1.4.1/scipy-0.8.0 by "François Bissey"
1 On 09/09/2010 03:47:27 AM, François Bissey wrote:
2
3 > Hi Steve,
4 >
5 > just to be clear, when you enter the data of the test manually in sage there
6 > is no problems?
7 > We already have one test like that, and there are a few reports of phantom
8 > failing tests on sage-devel so it is possible.
9 >
10 > Francois
11 >
12
13 François ,
14
15 When the following
16
17 sage: x = polygen(GF(121, 'a'))
18 sage: C = HyperellipticCurve(x^5 + x - 1, x^2 + 2)
19 sage: len(C.points())
20 122
21
22 is entered manually I get the expected result. The last line of the sage input
23 is where
24
25 sage -t -force_lib
26 "devel/sage/sage/schemes/hyperelliptic_curves/hyperelliptic_finite_field.py"
27
28 fails. I downgraded to
29
30 sage-doc-4.5.2-r1
31 numpy-1.3.0-r2
32 scipy-0.7.2-r1
33 sage-4.5.2-r1
34
35 and the test passed. I then upgraded to the latest sage-doc, numpy, scipy and
36 sage and the test passed, but only the first time. On subsequent tries the
37 test has failed.
38
39 Steve

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] [sage-on-gentoo] numpy-1.4.1/scipy-0.8.0 "François Bissey" <f.r.bissey@×××××××××.nz>