| 1 |
On 7/11/22 14:55, François Bissey wrote: |
| 2 |
> I am very of the mind that we should stop the splitting. Versionning of |
| 3 |
> the individual packages is a bit in the air but following the meta |
| 4 |
> package versioning is the easiest maintenance wise. |
| 5 |
|
| 6 |
Writing down stuff and posting it helps to think about it. Following the |
| 7 |
meta packaging versioning may break tracking with repology, so best to |
| 8 |
avoid it. |
| 9 |
|
| 10 |
Other stuff that I should mention: |
| 11 |
doc building will not happen with the current cmake implementation. Meta |
| 12 |
building is still handled by a makefile with some options and docs are |
| 13 |
still built by the generic makefiles. |
| 14 |
|
| 15 |
Same with test suites. We currently use "Demo" as test suites. They can |
| 16 |
be built from cmake (at least in some of the packages) but they are not |
| 17 |
currently executed and tested by cmake. |
| 18 |
|
| 19 |
openmp: is currently automagic for most packages supporting it. Used if |
| 20 |
found. I can work with upstream to turn it off if necessary.y |
| 21 |
|
| 22 |
Upside: cuda is handled fairly well by cmake compared to autoconf. |
| 23 |
|
| 24 |
François |
Archives