Gentoo Archives: gentoo-science

From: Markus Dittrich <markusle@g.o>
To: gentoo-science@l.g.o
Subject: Re: [gentoo-science] [Fwd: BLAS and CBLAS in Gentoo]
Date: Tue, 10 Jul 2007 12:49:17
Message-Id: Pine.LNX.4.64.0707101243200.1277@woodpecker.gentoo.org
In Reply to: [gentoo-science] [Fwd: BLAS and CBLAS in Gentoo] by "Adam Piątyszek"
1 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
2 Hash: SHA1
3
4 On Tue, 10 Jul 2007, Adam Pityszek wrote:
5 > Hi All,
6 >
7 > I am forwarding my email to Sebastien regarding the merging of blas- and
8 > cblas-reference into one package. Sebastien accepted this idea, but we
9 > would like to hear your opinions as well, since you are the real users
10 > of scientific libraries in Gentoo.
11 >
12 > BR,
13 > /Adam
14 >
15
16 This sounds like a fine plan to me, particularly since most
17 blas implementations in portage do provide both blas and cblas
18 at the same time. In addition, this would render the eselect
19 framework less complicated which I find desirable.
20
21 cheers,
22 Markus
23
24
25 - --
26 Markus Dittrich (markusle)
27 Gentoo Linux Developer
28 Scientific applications
29 -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
30 Version: GnuPG v1.4.6 (GNU/Linux)
31
32 iD8DBQFGk4AXxlRwCwb7k40RAkdMAKCL3E5bvyMYT0diIe5+DVff5R1ZdgCcDfjs
33 +7qr5QyIngp7fZWtP3ev5Cs=
34 =y+8W
35 -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
36 --
37 gentoo-science@g.o mailing list

Replies

Subject Author
Re: [gentoo-science] [Fwd: BLAS and CBLAS in Gentoo] "M. Edward (Ed) Borasky" <znmeb@×××××××.net>